Leading the agenda
Tuesday, 16 June 2009
It has been just over 2 years now since the 2007 Scottish Parliamentary elections and when the rules changed in terms of devolution and the constitutional future of Scotland has been a matter of debate ever since.
In all honesty it shouldn't have taken a narrow SNP victory for the Scottish Parliament to look at the constitutional future about Scotland. Donald Dewar may not have actually said that devolution was a process and not an event but he may as well have.
And to understand the full implications of the report by Kenneth Calman it's necessary to look at the purpose of the Scottish Parliament. Andrew Neill repeated the old myth on the Daily Politics yesterday that one of the reasons for a devolved parliament was to kill off the SNP.
The truth is that their was no democratic deficit in Scotland. Instead devolution was about something far more important: bringing democracy closer to the people and the fact that it wasn't always represented as this was a failure of the Yes campaign.
Yet we are where we are and the SNP's victory coupled with the 10th anniversary of the Scottish Parliament has made it a perfect opportunity to deliver a strengthening of our national Parliament.
There were 2 ways in which this could have gone.
It could have gone down the route of the so-called 'National Conversation' where the Scottish Government have had a massive consultation with the entire country on the possibility of an independent Scotland... except it's not really a national conversation before.
Instead there have been 600 comments on the website of which a vast number appear to be the same group of people debating with each other about the tyranny of the Union. It appears to be, for want of a better word, a group of 'neurotic cyber nats' and it hasn't led to a single change.
Then you look at the Calman Commission. Delivered after a year with close consultation with a variety of experts Kenneth Calman has delivered a significant and radical set of proposals that could change the way Scotland governs itself forever.
There is going to be a great deal of debate on the recommendations in the next few weeks (personally I think the income tax changes could be the most important in the history of our Parliament and change the way it operates and it's importance) but there can be no doubt that is opposition parties who have led the agenda on this and it is the opposition parties who will be the ones who will deliver constitutional change for the Scottish people.
If, as seems very likely from Jim Murphy's comments, that the British Government support and will implement the recommendations then it will be a massive embarrassment to the Scottish Government that it was every main political party apart from them who have managed to deliver some real lasting change and based on the first 2 years at least the opposition parties can now legitimately claim that the most influential decision taken in this term did not involve the SNP at all.
That is something which Wendy Alexander can claim a significant amount of credit for. It's no great secret that there were some within the Labour Party who felt the Calman Commission a waste of time and felt that we were just trying to out-nationalist the Nationalists but she stuck to her guns and now we are seeing the results of her foresight.
And credit must go to Iain Gray to sticking to it, particularly after the interim report when it seemed like it would be simpler to simply forget about the entire process. There has been a problem in Scottish Labour in the past with the party having good representation at Holyrood and at Westminster.
There's no doubt that there were a minority within the party who have consistently viewed the Scottish Parliament as a lesser parliament and our parliamentarians as lesser politicians with less important work. No more.
With these radical tax powers and the Scottish Parliament leading media and civic debate there can be no doubt at all of the power, responsibility and importance of Holyrood and that tiny minority who never believed in devolution will see that they were simply wrong.
Quite frankly it wasn't acceptable how long it took some of the old guard within my party to accept that we were no longer in power and we had to adapt and change. No more.
The Calman Commission marks day 0 of the 2011 election narrative. Scottish Labour will be the reforming exciting party with new ideas. There will be a clear distinction between a party who really believe in the Scottish Parliament and have a clear ideology which drives them forward and flows through our manifesto and a party who want independence and independence alone.
Game on, as they say.

9 comments:
i think you miss a few points. contrary to the media report, calman didnt "dumfound his critics" he dumfounded those he founded the report. calman was for more radical than the vague remit he was given by wendy et al stipulated.
also, even if you take labours figures, at the very very least 25% of the country is in favour of independence, so to completely ignore it as an issue shows that the remit of calman was still indicative of labours post 2007 defeat denial.
Scottish Labour Party?? What's Scottih about it?!
A thoughtful well obseved post Yousef. I think what is missing though from the Calman process is democratic endorsement.
If, as you say, devoltion is about extending democracy rather than dishing the nats, surely this is essential for such a radical extension of our parliament's powers?
Leave it all to a committee of politicans headed by Jim Murphy to decide? How old poltics, what a wholly iinaprpriate was to mark a decade of devolution.
"The truth is that their was no democratic deficit in Scotland. Instead devolution was about something far more important: bringing democracy closer to the people and the fact that it wasn't always represented as this was a failure of the Yes campaign"
Eh?....ome mixed up thinking their laddie.
"Instead there have been 600 comments on the website of which a vast number appear to be the same group of people debating"
There have been 4500 comments, over 500,000 hits and over 3,000 people have attended one of the 25 National Conversation events held over the past year.
oh Dear Yousuf.
"Kenneth Calman has delivered a significant and radical set of proposals"
Radical to who?
Labour seem incapable of discriminating their own politics from the Scottish people's, what arrogance.
"That is something which Wendy Alexander can claim a significant amount of credit for"
So why did you sack her?
"If, as seems very likely from Jim Murphy's comments, that the British Government support and will implement the recommendations then it will be a massive embarrassment to the Scottish Government"
OMG, I see that Lord Foulkes has been training you in the way of the dark arts, are you his 'apprentice' or is that 'kezia dungpile?"
"credit must go to Iain Gray "
Barf
"There's no doubt that there were a minority within the party who have consistently viewed the Scottish Parliament as a lesser parliament and our parliamentarians as lesser politicians with less important work. No more."
Your poverty of vision and ambition is Scotland's shame Yousuf. Get off yer knees.
"Scottish Labour will be the reforming exciting party with new ideas"
Ian Gray has been in his post fo0r over a year, where are the policies Yousuf?
"There will be a clear distinction between a party who really believe in the Scottish Parliament and have a clear ideology which drives them forward and flows through our manifesto and a party who want independence and independence alone"
Your so confused on this aren't you.
Re-red that last paragraph back to yourself slowly.
Support a refernedum or get out of the way.
The Scottish people want their say.
HP - the remit was deliberately broad so that he could be as radical as is deemed necessary.
Wardog it's very simple opposition is a 2-stage process. One is holding the Government to account and that has been very easy with a set of broken promises from the SNP.
The second is setting out an alternative vision which becomes more important as an election comes closer and that's what you will see over the next 2 years.
"One is holding the Government to account"
Yeah, the Labour Group leader at Holyrood is doing a grand job of that. 7% of Scots want him as FM.
"The second is setting out an alternative vision which becomes more important as an election comes closer and that's what you will see over the next 2 years."
Somehow I think it may be difficult to sell an 'alternative' to voters that stinks of compromise and grudge. And even harder given the activity-free disaster area that the Labour grassroots has become. But good luck with it all the same.
"The truth is that their was no democratic deficit in Scotland. Instead devolution was about something far more important: bringing democracy closer to the people and the fact that it wasn't always represented as this was a failure of the Yes campaign."
You might want to reword this Yousuf.
"There was no democratic deficit in Scotland. Instead there was a democratic deficit" is the short version of the above.
Calman's report will be yesterday's news very quickly and I daresay most Scots don't know much about it. There is no mandate for it without it having either been in a winning manifesto or having a referendum.
Labour are in a very tricky spot.
Yousaf it's very simple. If these measures are really implemented in the space of 10 months - which I rather doubt - it will be proof positive that voting SNP delivers progress for Scotland.
That is an inducement to vote SNP, whether or not you support independence. Independence will of course be decided directly by the people in a referendum, not by a cabal of politicians behind closed dooors.
What Calman has done therefore is to demonstrate beyond doubt that voting SNP gets results. Don't even pretend that any of this would have happened without an SNP victory - we all know it wouldn't have.
Post a Comment